Saturday , September 18 2021

Bohemian Rhapsody: 100% Queen



The first November is premiered in Colombia one of the most prominent films this year. With only one week of layoffs, Bohemian Rhapsody managed to raise more than $ 100 million in North American theaters, and is expected to be less than the passage through Latin countries.

In 1995, just four years after the death of Freddie Mercury, rumors circulated in Hollywood that some directors wanted to bring the life of an artist to a big screen. Until then, Queen's fans saw the film industry more likely to exploit economically the situation than real interest in displaying the life of a person who was one of Rock's most important characters in his history. In addition, the strike for the rest of the band members was still on the surface and was reversed between the various acknowledgments received by their late leaders and the terrible bureaucratic issues they had to solve in order to share the royalty of the great empire that they built together since the 1970s

By 2005, the first real flutes with the band began. Brian May and Roger Taylor, since John Deacon retired from the stage in 1997, received bids from various producers to seriously consider the film project about the life of Mercury. Many of these bids have suggested the implementation of background biopic, with a special emphasis on band history, but those ideas did not attract musicians, as they realized that they could devote themselves to future inconveniences. "We're a rock star. We always want to shine more than others," Taylor once commented. Certainly, fanatics would require greater importance from some of them, or even they could create disputes among themselves. They remained on the margins for the time that followed, while at one point it seemed that things began to find their way.

The project began to formally form in 2010. At that time an actor who had a greater chances of playing Merkur was Sacha Baron Cohen, better known for comedy roles than for important leading roles (thank God for not being elected). The British had the approval of members of the band because of its distinctive manner of wearing the mustache and the seeming strange personality that would be on the good path to what they were looking for. As for those nominated as film directors, Tom Hooper (King's Speech) and David Fincher (Fight Club) They talked the most about them.

Everything was supposed to start shooting in 2011, but things were later postponed until 2013, when Cohen clearly said he would not take part in the project if they could not solve what was "a series of creative differences" for him. After some time, the actor will find in the interview that the band has forced him to leave, since his past as a comedic actor will be a distraction. In addition, the scenario idea at that time was that Freddie Mercury's death was the central point of the plot, and then focused on how the band went in spite of the loss (if that was the case, I warrant that the movie would not collect half of what it has been so far achieved).

After analyzing the profile of more than 20 directors, sharing ideas and thinking about the acting body, the band found Bryan Singer the answer they were looking for. The idea was to make a film that corrected Freddie Merkur's picture, and it is true that Singer perfectly understood it. Although his choice was not particularly understandable, not because he was not a trained director, but because of his career as a director of criminal intrigue and fantasy and science fiction like X-Men (2000) i X-Men 2 (2003) Superman Returns (2006) X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014) I X-Men: Apocalypse (2016), a more relevant geek world that has become so commercial. The only movie about the actual events that were occupied by then was Valkyrie (2008), a historic thriller about an attempted assassination attempt by Adolf Hitler, a bit far from what should take the direction of the Bohemian rhapsody. However, he will show great passion for the project and no doubt his great success would be to consider Rama Malek as an actor who had to take responsibility for the interpretation of the Mercury.

Things went well with him until he was released in 2017 for "unprofessional behavior". At the end of that year, in full shooting, Singer disappeared from the recording for a few days. There were no justifications and, adding to the series of allegations of sexual abuse, it was decided to give it the most healthy giving up and to continue what Dexter Fletcher had begun, who was generally elected to face the challenge. Obviously, due to some differences with the producers, he left, but returned to continue with what might be one of the best biopics he could ever manage, who would finally see the light after eight years of uncertainty and indecision.

Apart from their work in Zagreb, Wild Bill (2011) i Sun on Leith (2013), Fletcher has achieved one of the most popular biographies in the recent years: Eddie Eagleabout renowned British skier Michael Edwards, whose history, to be mentioned, is shared by several movie elements with Freddie Mercury. So, accompanied by affinity groups and assisted scripts by Peter Morgan, who was later written by New Zealander Anthony McCarten, the same film writer wrote Theory of everything (2014) I The brightest clock (2017), Fletcher is ready to continue.

The latest scenario reveals the building of intelligent dialogues, with undeniable dramatic power and witty twisting to keep the audience alert. He is not happy with the tragedy of Freddie Mercury and the band, some of his personal problems and how they have achieved their greatest achievements, but also the creative dynamics of the Queen with narrative fluidity of absolute clarity. Although with some bumps in what concerns the order in which things are given, achieving writers is acceptable. What really interests the film is to show the undisputed musical talent of the artist and how it has become a legend, overcoming the rest of his life and not putting too much emphasis on the toughest episodes. It enabled Bryan Singer and, ultimately, Dexter Fletcher to produce a movie that stands out for his film lucidity and enthusiasm. Undoubtedly, one of the biopics of musicians is best achieved in the contemporary cinema.

Now, there is no doubt that most of us, passionate about the cinema and the music of this legendary British band, had expectations for the sky, not so much for the film itself, but for Rami Malek's performance, his interpretation of one of the most beautiful characters in the history of rock and music in general: mysterious Freddie Mercury. The result is simply incredible.

"The boy is great, that's the presence of Freddie, scattered all the suspicious people [cuando lo vean] The screen will surely believe that it is Freddie, "said Brian May in an interview with AP." This performance deserves, regardless of this, all possible awards and recognitions. "Malek's work was so good that he succeeded in improving the performance of his peers and the environment of the film itself, not only emerging from the challenge of winning, but literally becoming Freddie Mercury, in his acting, physical appearance and the use of non-verbal language the key to not being able to imitate him, but realizing his complete commitment to the point of imitating him, hiding the weakness of the film, I would say that he himself is the whole film and that will be for this role to be remembered in the future because it became a legend.

Although some critics have indicated that they see in the film's surface proposal, a script that does not enter Freddie Merkur's drama, what is really unquestioning, if we objectively understand it, is that Bohemian Rhapsodyexcept that it was not a big movie they all expected, is a great set of what we could call "100% success".


Source link